Maintained by NextGen Coastal — $342M under management in OC & LA
Keating Memo · Familial status

Tenant has too many people in the unit. Two per bedroom is the line.

HUD's two-per-bedroom baseline. Stricter limits are familial status discrimination unless justified by specific objective factors. Address actual overcrowding through cure-or-quit only after confirming your limit is lawful.

TL;DR

HUD Keating Memo: two-per-bedroom is presumptively reasonable. Tighter limits = familial status discrimination unless justified by specific factors. Address overcrowding via cure or quit citing a compliant occupancy clause. Verify lease limit complies before serving.

The two-per-bedroom baseline

HUD's 1998 Keating Memo establishes that a two-persons-per-bedroom occupancy standard is presumptively reasonable. California courts and FEHA enforcement follow this framework. Limits below this are presumptively discriminatory under familial status because they disproportionately exclude families with children.

When stricter limits qualify

Common questions — overcrowding

What's the limit?

Two-per-bedroom presumption under HUD Keating Memo.

One-per-bedroom OK?

Generally no without specific objective justification.

Genuinely overcrowded?

Cure or quit citing a compliant limit. Verify the limit first.

Children count?

Yes toward occupancy, but cannot be used to set stricter limits.

Code enforcement?

City housing codes have square-foot-based limits that provide objective bases.

Occupancy compliance review

Free assessment of your occupancy clause and FEHA exposure.

Request a free review →