Three overlapping regimes: state §1947.5 smoking disclosure, Prop 64's six-plant cultivation right, and a patchwork of city smoke-free housing ordinances. Landlords have broad authority here — broader than most tenants realize.
Civil Code §1947.5 lets landlords prohibit smoking and requires the lease to state the policy. The prohibition reaches cannabis smoking. Cannabis cultivation can be banned by lease clause. Prop 64 didn't override either. Most California cities also have local smoke-free multi-unit housing ordinances stacking on top.
Civil Code §1947.5 expressly authorizes California landlords to prohibit smoking on residential rental property. The lease has to state the policy — whether smoking is prohibited everywhere, in some specified areas, or unrestricted. The policy applies to all tenants and guests. Enforcement runs through normal lease-violation channels (3-Day Notice to Cure or Quit).
"Smoking" in §1947.5 covers tobacco, cannabis, and any other combustible. The statute uses inclusive language. Cannabis smoking is no different from tobacco smoking under §1947.5.
Proposition 64 (2016) legalized adult-use cannabis in California, but it didn't override landlord property rights. Two restrictions are particularly common in residential leases:
Most professionally drafted leases prohibit both. Cultivation in particular creates moisture, electrical load, and odor issues that affect adjacent units — the violation costs the landlord money to remediate. A no-cultivation clause is enforceable and worth including.
A number of California cities require all multi-unit residential rentals to be smoke-free, regardless of what the lease says. The exact rules vary by jurisdiction — some prohibit smoking in units, some in common areas, some both. Verify the current rule on the city's housing program page before relying on the lease alone. Local ordinances stack on top of §1947.5; they don't replace it.
Tenants occasionally argue that medical cannabis use requires a reasonable accommodation under FEHA or the FHA. California case law has generally rejected this. Cannabis remains a Schedule I controlled substance under federal law, and landlords are not required to accommodate use that violates federal law. A no-smoking and no-cultivation policy is enforceable against medical users.
The narrow carve-out is non-combustible forms — edibles, oils, tinctures — where the use doesn't actually involve smoking and doesn't violate the lease's no-cultivation clause. Those typically can't be prohibited solely because they involve cannabis.
Smoking or cultivation in violation of the lease is a curable lease violation. Standard procedure:
Yes. Civil Code §1947.5 expressly authorizes it. The lease has to state the policy. Many cities also have local smoke-free multi-unit housing ordinances requiring the prohibition.
Yes. Smoking (including cannabis) under §1947.5. Cultivation by separate lease clause. Prop 64 didn't override property rights or lease terms.
Prop 64 allows up to six plants per residence, but the right is subject to lease restrictions and local ordinances. A no-cultivation clause is enforceable.
California courts have generally held that medical cannabis doesn't require accommodation under FEHA or the FHA. The no-smoking and no-cultivation policies are enforceable against medical users. Non-combustible forms (edibles, oils) typically can't be prohibited solely because they involve cannabis.
Free review of your lease, the evidence, and the cleanest procedural path under §1161.
Request a free review →